anscheinend hat intel mit seinen neuen sandy bridge prozessoren mal ordentlich in den mist gegriffen. wenn amd sich halbwegs clever anstellt, dann werden die neuen bulldozer intel das fürchten lernen, allein schon im bereich gpu kann intel einpacken.
Zitat
That's when the crippling bug surfaced. It seems the USB3 ports on the Intel DH67BL don't want to work. Ubuntu 10.10 installs fail during the install, no fix was found. Plug the same stick into a USB2 port, and it works fine. Alternately, install from a USB2 stick on a USB3 port, and things work fine.
The USB3 port uses a bog standard NEC chip, so there should not be any problems, but something is badly off. The first thought is that this is a driver issue, but since it is during an OS install, the port should be seen as a USB2 port and just work at the lower speeds. It doesn't fall back correctly, the install just blows up. Moving to either a USB2 stick or a USB2 port fixes the problem.
tja, da scheint wohl ein massives problem mit dem schicken usb 3.0 hardwareseitig vorzuliegen. was für ein showstopper bug.
aber das ist ja noch nicht alles
Zitat
Unfortunately for Intel, they simply do not work. No, you are not reading that wrong, the graphics are simply broken on Linux. While this is not the only thing broken, being able to put up anything more than basic 2D VGA images is rather mandatory now, and Intel flat out fails. There are no drivers available for Sandy Bridge upon release. If you buy a Sandy setup and want to run Linux, you just bought a doorstop.
wie peinlich, kein linux möglich mit intels gpu lösung. selbst jede bechissene alte tnt macht das besser.
Zitat
It is honestly that bad. Running the Phoronix Test Suite's OpenGL tests, the few that didn't outright fail ran at zero to one FPS. If you plugged in a discrete card, in our case an ATI HD5830, the same tests ran at hundreds of FPS, showing that they are not exactly demanding. 600FPS on a high end card should result in fairly playable frame rates on even the wimpiest of integrated GPUs.
OpenGL on Sandy Bridge is totally non-functional. How bad is it? Well, if you turn Compiz on, moving windows around the screen is an exercise in watching things stutter. It is painful. Games as complex as Tux Racer produce a lower frame rate than the same thing on an iPhone, so slow that it is unplayable. If moving a window on the desktop or playing Tux Racer is too taxing..... Ouch. Fail.
... oh, opengl geht auch nicht, nicht schlecht ....
Zitat
So, back to the 'must have or your coffee shop experience is not complete' feature set. They include Video Processing Accelerators - never coming to Linux, Color Processing Accellerators - never coming to Linux, Skin Tone Enhancements - never coming to Linux, Adaptive Contrast Enhancment - never coming to Linux, Total Color Control - never coming to Linux, Video Decode in hardware - Q1, Video Encode in hardware - Q1, 3D accelleration - Q1 sooner rather than later and a host of software to use it - never coming to Linux.
... da werden aber einige oems ganz gut kotzen.
und wie reagiert intel auf dieses ergebnis:
Zitat
Intel: 'Charlie tested unreleased Sandybridge hardware without drivers. No hardware can function properly without drivers on any operating system, and as such, these results are not valid. We encourage Semiaccurate to retest the platform with the appropriate drivers in place'
Editor would like to note that Intel provided the unreleased hardware and drivers for Windows 7, Windows XP, and Vista. No drivers were provided for any flavor of Linux, and none were available short of building from source on our own. We do not feel this meets any reasonable standard for 'available'. We await appropriate drivers from Intel for re-testing, but as of press time, none were available.
soso, die tester haben keine richtigen treiber zum testen verwendet und intel hat bis jetzt nicht geschnitten, dass sie selbst nicht einmal treiber für linux anbieten ....
oha, die chance sollte amd nutzen und mal so richtig den finger in die wunde legen ....
quelle
